Scope

The model must detect injected inconsistencies without direct hints and decide whether design claims remain structurally valid.

Score

• Overall: 7.8 / 10
• Contradictions detected: 8 / 10

Strength Pattern

• Strong under explicit architectural structure
• Good semantic reasoning around ordering and retries

Gap Pattern

• Real-time bounds and resource pressure analysis are less reliable
• Some answers stay at guarantee-level language instead of enforceability-level proof

Verdict

Good defensive reasoning, but not yet expert in hard constraint or infra-feasibility analysis.